Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Successor is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the HZ35W (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was announced 20 months before the DP2 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the HZ35W matches up versus the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
HZ35W | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung HZ35W
DP2 Merrill | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP2 Merrill
HZ35W | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W provides physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the HZ35W against the DP2 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will give you extra detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Also referred to as | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $931 |