Clicky

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Samsung HZ35W front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Also referred to as WB650
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The HZ35W was released 4 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the HZ35W matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 HZ35W DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung HZ35W

 DP2 Quattro HZ35W 
IntroducedFebruary 2014June 2010More recent by 44 months
Display resolution920k614kSharper display (+306k dot)

Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 HZ35W DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W has outer measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the HZ35W against the DP2 Quattro.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the HZ35W and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The HZ35W because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
34
focusing manually
has face detect focus
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Street photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (245g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography factors
42
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
48
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
63
lighter than average (245g)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
53
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
31
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
lighter than average (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
9
no video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Samsung HZ35WSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung HZ35W Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also Known as WB650 -
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2010-06-16 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-360mm (15.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.8 f/2.8
Macro focus range 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 614 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-11A BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $300 $931