Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Old Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Following is a complete review of the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the HZ35W (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe HZ35W was revealed 22 months before the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the HZ35W matches up versus the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
HZ35W | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung HZ35W
SD1 Merrill | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD1 Merrill
HZ35W | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W features exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the HZ35W vs the SD1 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and SD1 Merrill is 91 and 57 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and SD1 Merrill.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HZ35W using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide you with more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | WB650 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $2,339 |