Clicky

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Samsung HZ35W front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Revealed November 2002
  • Successor is Sigma SD10
Photography Glossary

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The HZ35W was launched 7 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the HZ35W grades versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma SD9

 HZ35W SD9 
RevealedJune 2010November 2002Fresher by 92 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution614k130kCrisper display (+484k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung HZ35W

 SD9 HZ35W 

Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD9

 HZ35W SD9 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ35W offers exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Check the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the HZ35W versus the SD9.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and SD9 is 91 and 54 respectively.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and SD9.

All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung HZ35W will result in more detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer HZ35W provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography info
Sigma SD9 Portrait photography info
34
has manual focus
features face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
47
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution (3 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Street photography information
Sigma SD9 Street photography information
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (245g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (950g)
maximum ISO low (400)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Sports photography details
Sigma SD9 Sports photography details
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
36
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000s)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (3MP)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
Travel photography with Sigma SD9
63
lighter than average (245 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
29
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (950g)
low resolution (3MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung HZ35W
Landscape photography with Sigma SD9
43
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
41
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (3 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Vlogging highlights
Sigma SD9 Vlogging highlights
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than average (245 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD9
 Samsung HZ35WSigma SD9
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung HZ35W Sigma SD9
Also called WB650 -
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2010-06-16 2002-11-26
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 3 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-360mm (15.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.8 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of display 614k dot 130k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lbs) 950 gr (2.09 lbs)
Dimensions 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-11A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $300 $3,001