Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

The HZ35W was launched 7 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the HZ35W grades versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ35W & Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma SD9
HZ35W | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | ![]() | November 2002 | Fresher by 92 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper display (+484k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung HZ35W
SD9 | HZ35W |
---|
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma SD9
HZ35W | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ35W offers exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Samsung HZ35W versus Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the HZ35W versus the SD9.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and SD9 is 91 and 54 respectively.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and SD9.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung HZ35W will result in more detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer HZ35W provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sigma SD9 |
Also called | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $3,001 |