Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Succeeded the Sony HX300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and HX400V (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe HZ35W was manufactured 4 years before the HX400V and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the HZ35W scores versus the HX400V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony HX400V
| HZ35W | HX400V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Samsung HZ35W
| HX400V | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Crisper display (+307k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX400V
| HZ35W | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys outside dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony HX400V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the HZ35W against the HX400V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and HX400V is 91 and 62 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and HX400V.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX400V to render more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older HZ35W will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Also referred to as | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 660 grams (1.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $448 |
