Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300M front Samsung NX300M front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Old Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Samsung NX300M versus Sony A290, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the NX300M (20MP) and A290 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The NX300M was brought out 2 years after the A290 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the NX300M scores vs the A290 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung NX300M and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are available at Samsung NX300M Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Sony A290
NX300M | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+538k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Samsung NX300M
A290 | NX300M |
---|
Common features in the Samsung NX300M and Sony A290
NX300M | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung NX300M comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Sony A290 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung NX300M versus Sony A290 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the NX300M vs the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/168b5/168b5bfb0286c98a668b260ae6eb5f6ca7914f91" alt="Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 size comparison Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the NX300M and A290 is 86 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50a57/50a5733f6966dfa59459312dea199c6b0f0a39e1" alt="Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the NX300M and A290.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung NX300M to provide you with extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent NX300M will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4088/c40882fce239f8c9f4e725e214c406e3685275f6" alt="Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ad41/0ad417f36396dc2e68f9068578ebd8cbad7e252c" alt="Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung NX300M vs Sony A290 Specifications
Samsung NX300M | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung NX300M | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-01-03 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DRIMe IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 247 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Samsung NX | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 32 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 768 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 290 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP1130 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $699 | $600 |