Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB210, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL102 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB210 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SL102 matches up against the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB210
| SL102 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Samsung SL102
| WB210 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB210
| SL102 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 features outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the SL102 versus the WB210.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and WB210 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and WB210.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB210 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB210 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $279 |