Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SL202 was announced 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SL202 grades versus the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB350F
| SL202 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Samsung SL202
| WB350F | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 59 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB350F
| SL202 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 provides outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SL202 vs the WB350F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and WB350F.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB350F |
| Other name | PL50 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-02-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $140 | $260 |