Clicky

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Samsung SL202 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SL202 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SL202 scores versus the SD1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SL202 SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung SL202

 SD1 Merrill SL202 
IntroducedApril 2012February 2009Newer by 38 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SL202 SD1 Merrill 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung SL202 features physical dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Compare the Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 versus the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL202 and SD1 Merrill.

All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL202 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will result in greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
25
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
focusing manually
good resolution (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung SL202 Street photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography highlights
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
57
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
61
good resolution (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography highlights
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
weather proof
good resolution (15 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL202 Landscape photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography details
27
fairly wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
63
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3")
good resolution (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
no liveview
no image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL202 Vlogging features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging features
27
fairly wide (28mm)
has face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone port
9
can't shoot video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL202 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL202 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung SL202Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung SL202 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Also called PL50 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2009-02-17 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.7 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 790 grams (1.74 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $140 $2,339