Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
89 Imaging
66 Features
74 Overall
69
Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 283g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched August 2014
- Old Model is Sony a5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and a5100 (24MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and a5100 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL202 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the a5100 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony a5100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SL202 scores vs the a5100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL202 & Sony Alpha a5100. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Sony a5100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony a5100
| SL202 | a5100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony a5100 over the Samsung SL202
| a5100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 66 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony a5100
| SL202 | a5100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony a5100 has dimensions of 110mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 compared to the a5100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and a5100 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and a5100.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SL202 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sony a5100 will show extra detail due to its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung SL202 vs Sony a5100 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha a5100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Alpha a5100 |
| Also Known as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2014-08-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 179 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (120p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) | 283 gr (0.62 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1347 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $140 | $448 |
