Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaf8/2eaf83d822e69481fe2112141f904cee5032a36b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V front"
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Released October 2016
- Older Model is Sony RX100 IV
- Successor is Sony RX100 VI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Samsung SL202 and Sony RX100 V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SL202 was launched 8 years earlier than the RX100 V and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SL202 grades versus the RX100 V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL202 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony RX100 V
SL202 | RX100 V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Samsung SL202
RX100 V | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2016 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 92 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony RX100 V
SL202 | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL202 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony RX100 V has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL202 and Sony RX100 V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SL202 and the RX100 V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe41/1fe41f47da9c68037d560cdc08683409b2b0aeb2" alt="Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V size comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and RX100 V is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f97d/6f97d8ffa16f5d7b874475c85decb05cdbb940bf" alt="Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V top view buttons comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V top view buttons comparison"
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and RX100 V.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SL202 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX100 V will result in more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4885/d4885ddd37ad3ad5ee54e49d50bcbef4b54c95ca" alt="Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V sensor size comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V sensor size comparison"
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a00e9/a00e9eb86de7593a5eaafe5d84ef10c0780295bc" alt="Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung SL202 vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Also called | PL50 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 lbs) | 299g (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $140 | $998 |