Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Samsung SL202 versus Sony W650, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and W650 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL202 was released 3 years earlier than the W650 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the SL202 grades against the W650 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Sony W650
| SL202 | W650 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Samsung SL202
| W650 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 35 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Sony W650
| SL202 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 provides outside dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony W650 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL202 versus Sony W650 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SL202 compared to the W650.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL202 and W650 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL202 and W650.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony W650 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged SL202 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung SL202 vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Otherwise known as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 124g (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $140 | $140 |
