Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Released September 2018
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Samsung SL202 and Zeiss ZX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Zeiss. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the SL202 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe SL202 was brought out 10 years earlier than the ZX1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SL202 matches up versus the ZX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 and Zeiss ZX1. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Zeiss ZX1
| SL202 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Samsung SL202
| ZX1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 116 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 4.34" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+1.64") |
| Display resolution | 2765k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+2535k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Zeiss ZX1
| SL202 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL202 has outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Zeiss ZX1 has dimensions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung SL202 and Zeiss ZX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the SL202 against the ZX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and ZX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and ZX1.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL202 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Zeiss ZX1 will offer you more detail having its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older SL202 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung SL202 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Zeiss |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Also called | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2018-09-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 255 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2-22 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 4.34" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 2,765k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | 512GB internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $140 | - |