Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB150F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL620 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB150F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SL620 grades versus the WB150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL620 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung WB150F
| SL620 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Samsung SL620
| WB150F | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB150F
| SL620 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 features outer measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SL620 compared to the WB150F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SL620 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and WB150F.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB150F to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SL620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB150F |
| Alternative name | PL65 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $230 |