Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL620 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SL620 grades versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung WB35F
SL620 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung SL620
WB35F | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | February 2009 | Newer by 59 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Samsung WB35F
SL620 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 features physical measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL620 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SL620 and the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL620 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The image here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to render greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung SL620 | Samsung WB35F |
Also called as | PL65 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $130 |