Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the SL620 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL620 was announced 13 months later than the A300 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the SL620 matches up against the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL620 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL620 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sony A300
| SL620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2009 | January 2008 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung SL620
| A300 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sony A300
| SL620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL620 comes with outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check the Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SL620 and the A300.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL620 and A300.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL620 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung SL620 will resolve extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher SL620 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL620 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Otherwise known as | PL65 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $0 |