Clicky

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25
Samsung SL620 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL65
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Newer Model is Sony WX350
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Overview

Here is a in-depth overview of the Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the SL620 (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SL620 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WX300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SL620 scores vs the WX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sony WX300

 SL620 WX300 

Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Samsung SL620

 WX300 SL620 
IntroducedFebruary 2013February 2009Fresher by 48 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sony WX300

 SL620 WX300 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL620 enjoys physical dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check the Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SL620 vs the WX300.

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL620 and WX300 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL620 and WX300.

To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony WX300 to give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SL620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL620 Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX300 Portrait photography highlights
26
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
36
resolution is good (18MP)
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung SL620 as a Street photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average (168g)
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (166g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL620 Sports photography advice
Sony WX300 Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
49
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL620 Travel photography features
Sony WX300 Travel photography features
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (168 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
lighter than competition in class (166 grams)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL620 Landscape photography information
Sony WX300 Landscape photography information
23
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse mode
44
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung SL620
Vlogging with Sony WX300
24
offers face detection autofocus
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than average (168 grams)
35
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (166g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung SL620 vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL620 and Sony WX300
 Samsung SL620Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung SL620 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Also Known as PL65 -
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-02-17 2013-02-20
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 25-500mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.7 f/3.5-6.5
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.60 m 4.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 168 grams (0.37 pounds) 166 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $200 $330