Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung ST150F versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST150F (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST150F was unveiled at a similar time to the WB250F which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the ST150F grades versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST150F & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST150F Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Samsung WB250F
| ST150F | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung ST150F
| WB250F | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST150F and Samsung WB250F
| ST150F | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST150F features exterior measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST150F versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the ST150F versus the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the ST150F and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The image underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST150F and WB250F.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST150F to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively.
Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung ST150F vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Samsung ST150F | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung ST150F | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | QVGA TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 114 grams (0.25 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $250 |