Clicky

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29
Samsung ST65 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Samsung. The image resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The ST65 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WB350F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the ST65 grades versus the WB350F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung WB350F

 ST65 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Samsung ST65

 WB350F ST65 
IntroducedJanuary 2014January 2011More recent by 36 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB350F

 ST65 WB350F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Screen resolution460k460kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST65 features outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Look at the Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the ST65 vs the WB350F.

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and WB350F is 99 and 90 respectively.

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and WB350F.

Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older ST65 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST65 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
28
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
40
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Samsung ST65 Street photography features
Samsung WB350F Street photography features
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low max ISO (0)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST65 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB350F Sports photography advice
26
resolution is good (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
50
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Samsung ST65 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
71
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition (276g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung ST65
Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
37
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
50
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST65 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
27
good maximum aperture (f)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung ST65 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST65 and Samsung WB350F
 Samsung ST65Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Samsung
Model Samsung ST65 Samsung WB350F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-19 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO - 3200
Min native ISO - 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 276g (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Time lapse shooting
Storage media - MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $130 $260