Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29


83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6000
- Renewed by Sony A6500

Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Samsung ST65 versus Sony A6300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.

The ST65 was introduced 6 years before the A6300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the ST65 scores against the A6300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST65 & Sony Alpha a6300. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A6300
ST65 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung ST65
A6300 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 61 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A6300
ST65 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 provides outer measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Samsung ST65 versus Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the ST65 against the A6300.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and A6300 is 99 and 83 respectively.

Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ST65 and A6300.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ST65 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A6300 will result in extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older ST65 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | - | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 404 grams (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $130 | $889 |