Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2013
Photography Glossary Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Samsung ST65 versus Sony QX100, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ST65 was released 3 years before the QX100 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the ST65 scores vs the QX100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The complete galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony QX100
| ST65 | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Samsung ST65
| QX100 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 32 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony QX100
| ST65 | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 has outside measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has proportions of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST65 versus Sony QX100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the ST65 versus the QX100.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and QX100 is 99 and 92 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ST65 and QX100.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ST65 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony QX100 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged ST65 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Released | 2011-01-19 | 2013-09-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 160 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | None |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $268 |