Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
58 Imaging
50 Features
76 Overall
60
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched March 2014
- Refreshed by Sony RX10 II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was unveiled 4 years before the RX10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the ST65 matches up against the RX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The full galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony RX10
| ST65 | RX10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Samsung ST65
| RX10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1290k | 460k | Sharper display (+830k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony RX10
| ST65 | RX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung ST65 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the ST65 vs the RX10.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and RX10 is 99 and 58 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ST65 and RX10.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ST65 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony RX10 will show extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older ST65 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2014-03-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | - | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,290 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | WhiteMagic |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 813 gr (1.79 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $698 |