Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
89 Imaging
50 Features
77 Overall
60
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Released May 2014
- Old Model is Sony RX100 II
- Updated by Sony RX100 IV
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Below, we are matching up the Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the ST93 (16MP) and the RX100 III (20MP) is fairly well matched but the ST93 (1/2.3") and RX100 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ST93 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the RX100 III which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the ST93 grades vs the RX100 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST93 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST93 Gallery & Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Sony RX100 III
| ST93 | RX100 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Samsung ST93
| RX100 III | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2014 | April 2011 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung ST93 and Sony RX100 III
| ST93 | RX100 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST93 enjoys outside dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Sony RX100 III has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the ST93 versus the RX100 III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST93 and RX100 III is 97 and 89 respectively.
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the ST93 and RX100 III.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ST93 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony RX100 III will resolve extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged ST93 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung ST93 vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
| Samsung ST93 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST93 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-04-20 | 2014-05-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) | 290 gr (0.64 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 67 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 495 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | - | $748 |