Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Samsung ST95 versus Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are designed by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ST95 was released 18 months after the TL225 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the ST95 scores versus the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST95 & Samsung TL225. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung TL225
| ST95 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Samsung ST95
| TL225 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung TL225
| ST95 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 comes with physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST95 versus Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the ST95 vs the TL225.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST95 and TL225 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and TL225.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to show more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher ST95 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL225 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 187 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $145 | $488 |
