Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Samsung ST95 and Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both manufactured by Samsung. The resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ST95 was manufactured 13 months after the TL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the ST95 matches up vs the TL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST95 & Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are available at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung TL240
| ST95 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung ST95
| TL240 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung TL240
| ST95 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Samsung ST95 enjoys outer measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST95 and Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the ST95 against the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and TL240 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and TL240.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent ST95 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $145 | $171 |
