Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ST95 was unveiled 7 months later than the TL500 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the ST95 matches up vs the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST95 & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung TL500
ST95 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | July 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Samsung ST95
TL500 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung TL500
ST95 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST95 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the ST95 compared to the TL500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and TL500 is 99 and 88 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and TL500.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The ST95 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung ST95 will give you more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The newer ST95 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST95 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called as | - | EX1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $145 | $527 |