Clicky

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31
Samsung ST95 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The ST95 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the ST95 grades versus the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sigma Quattro

 ST95 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST95

 Quattro ST95 
RevealedFebruary 2016January 2011Newer by 62 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen resolution1620k460kClearer screen (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sigma Quattro

 ST95 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the ST95 versus the Quattro.

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and Quattro.

Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will offer you greater detail having an extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged ST95 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST95 Portrait photography information
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography information
30
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
81
manual focus
megapixel count great (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung ST95 Street photography details
Sigma Quattro Street photography details
50
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low maximum ISO (0)
59
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (625g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST95 Sports photography factors
Sigma Quattro Sports photography factors
27
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
70
megapixel count great (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
supports phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung ST95
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
71
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
55
environment proof
megapixel count great (29 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (625g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
38
very good max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
72
manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
megapixel count great (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 Vlogging advice
Sigma Quattro Vlogging advice
27
very good max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
22
comes with face detect focusing
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video ( pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (625g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST95 and Sigma Quattro
 Samsung ST95Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung ST95 Sigma sd Quattro
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-01-19 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO - 6400
Min native ISO - 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range () -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Max video resolution 1280x720 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 625 gr (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $145 $738