Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST95 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the ST95 grades versus the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sigma Quattro
ST95 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST95
Quattro | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2011 | Newer by 62 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sigma Quattro
ST95 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the ST95 versus the Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and Quattro.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will offer you greater detail having an extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged ST95 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST95 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung ST95 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $145 | $738 |