Clicky

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230

Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30
Samsung ST95 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
49
Features
40
Overall
45

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Superseded the Sony A200
  • Later Model is Sony A290
Photography Glossary

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST95 versus Sony A230, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The ST95 was revealed 21 months later than the A230 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ST95 matches up against the A230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony A230

 ST95 A230 
ReleasedJanuary 2011May 2009More recent by 21 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Samsung ST95

 A230 ST95 
Manual focus More precise focus

Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony A230

 ST95 A230 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST95 has outside dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Check out the Samsung ST95 versus Sony A230 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the ST95 versus the A230.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and A230 is 99 and 69 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and A230.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ST95 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung ST95 will result in more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer ST95 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST95 Portrait photography advice
Sony A230 Portrait photography advice
29
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
53
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Street photography camera
Sony A230 as a Street photography camera
50
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
maximum ISO low (0)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST95 Sports photography highlights
Sony A230 Sports photography highlights
27
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
bad battery (230 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung ST95 Travel photography details
Sony A230 Travel photography details
71
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery (230 shots)
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
Landscape photography with Sony A230
37
fast max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
51
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
does not have liveview
low resolution (10 megapixels)
bad battery (230 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 Vlogging info
Sony A230 Vlogging info
27
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic socket
9
can't shoot video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST95 and Sony A230
 Samsung ST95Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung ST95 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2011-01-19 2009-05-18
Body design Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO - 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range () -
Available lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 490 grams (1.08 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $145 $569