Clicky

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II

Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30
Samsung ST95 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front
Portability
58
Imaging
51
Features
77
Overall
61

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs

Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony RX10 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10
  • New Model is Sony RX10 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is relatively close but the ST95 (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") possess different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The ST95 was introduced 5 years before the RX10 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ST95 scores versus the RX10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony RX10 II

 ST95 RX10 II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Samsung ST95

 RX10 II ST95 
IntroducedJune 2015January 2011Newer by 53 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1229k460kClearer screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony RX10 II

 ST95 RX10 II 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has sizing of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") along with a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

Look at the Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the ST95 vs the RX10 II.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and RX10 II is 99 and 58 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and RX10 II.

As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX10 II will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged ST95 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST95 Portrait photography advice
Sony RX10 II Portrait photography advice
29
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
70
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Samsung ST95 Street photography advice
Sony RX10 II Street photography advice
50
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
72
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proof
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST95 Sports photography features
Sony RX10 II Sports photography features
27
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
68
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides tracking focus
environment proof
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Samsung ST95 Travel photography information
Sony RX10 II Travel photography information
71
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
environment proof
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 II
37
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
62
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 Vlogging details
Sony RX10 II Vlogging details
27
great maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
30
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has mic jack
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST95 and Sony RX10 II
 Samsung ST95Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung ST95 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
Type Ultracompact Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-01-19 2015-06-10
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO - 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO - 125
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range () 24-200mm (8.3x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 10.20 m
Flash modes - Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 813 gr (1.79 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $145 $998