Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
79 Imaging
68 Features
58 Overall
64
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Replacement is Sony RX1R II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Samsung ST95 and Sony RX1R, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ST95 was announced 3 years earlier than the RX1R and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the ST95 matches up vs the RX1R for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are available at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony RX1R
| ST95 | RX1R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Samsung ST95
| RX1R | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony RX1R
| ST95 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Samsung ST95 enjoys external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Samsung ST95 and Sony RX1R in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the ST95 vs the RX1R.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and RX1R is 99 and 79 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and RX1R.
As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The ST95 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX1R will offer more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older ST95 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $145 | $2,798 |