Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Samsung ST95 versus Sony W370, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the W370 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ST95 was released 13 months later than the W370 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the ST95 grades vs the W370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony W370
| ST95 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Samsung ST95
| W370 | ST95 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony W370
| ST95 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Samsung ST95 provides outside dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony W370 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST95 versus Sony W370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the ST95 compared to the W370.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the ST95 and W370 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ST95 and W370.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung ST95 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger ST95 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung ST95 vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.6-5.6 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $145 | $230 |