Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
67 Imaging
56 Features
65 Overall
59
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.6" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 506g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released May 2012
- Replaced the Sony A35
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Samsung ST95 versus Sony A37, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the A37 (16MP) is relatively similar but the ST95 (1/2.3") and A37 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ST95 was manufactured 16 months before the A37 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A37 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the ST95 grades versus the A37 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST95 and Sony SLT-A37. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Sony A37 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony A37
| ST95 | A37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.6" | Bigger screen (+0.4") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A37 over the Samsung ST95
| A37 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 16 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony A37
| ST95 | A37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 comes with exterior measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A37 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 506 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST95 versus Sony A37 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the ST95 versus the A37.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and A37 is 99 and 67 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and A37.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The ST95 has the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The older ST95 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A37 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony SLT-A37 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST95 | Sony SLT-A37 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2012-05-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 2.6" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 506g (1.12 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.9 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 799 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $145 | $522 |