Samsung TL210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung TL210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as PL150
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill

Samsung TL210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill: An Expert Comparison for Your Next Camera Purchase
Choosing the right camera can make a profound difference in how you capture and express your creative vision. Today, we delve into an in-depth, hands-on comparison between two uniquely different compacts: the Samsung TL210, an ultracompact point-and-shoot from 2010, and the Sigma DP3 Merrill, a large sensor compact aimed at image quality purists from 2013. By unpacking the technology, handling, and performance of these two cameras at a granular level, we’ll help you decide which one fits best into your photography journey.
Getting Acquainted: Size, Design, and Ergonomics
Your camera should feel good in your hands since it fundamentally shapes your shooting experience. Let’s examine how these two stack up physically and ergonomically.
The Samsung TL210 is an ultracompact camera weighing just 177 grams and measuring 99 x 59 x 20 mm. Its slim profile and curved edges cater to comfortable pocketability and ease of use during street or travel photography. On the other hand, the Sigma DP3 Merrill is noticeably bulkier and heavier at 330 grams with dimensions of 122 x 67 x 59 mm, reflecting its large APS-C sensor housing and robust build quality geared toward professional use.
When you hold these cameras side by side, the TL210 is more about convenience and casual shooting, while the DP3 Merrill prioritizes substantial grip and manual handling. The Sigma’s manual focus ring and direct control over aperture and shutter priority modes hint at a design philosophy targeting photographers wanting granular control over exposure and manual focus precision.
Control Layout and Interface
The top control layout influences how quickly you can adjust settings in the field. The Samsung TL210’s minimalist design features basic mode dials and buttons, reflecting its simpler point-and-shoot operation. Conversely, the Sigma DP3 Merrill sports more traditional exposure controls with dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture, alongside an ISO button and custom white balance options, demonstrating its alignment with advanced users.
The DP3 Merrill’s clearly marked controls facilitate quicker exposure adjustments without delving into menus - ideal for those who want to react fast in dynamic lighting situations. Meanwhile, the TL210 serves well for straightforward point-and-shoot convenience, albeit with limited manual control.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CCD vs Foveon CMOS
One of the most critical differences lies in the sensor technology and size, which directly affects image quality, dynamic range, noise performance, and color rendition.
The Samsung TL210 employs a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with a resolution of 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000 pixels). Its sensor area is a modest 27.72 mm². CCD sensors, popular a decade ago, tend to have good color rendering but generally fall short in dynamic range and high ISO noise control compared to modern CMOS variants.
In contrast, the Sigma DP3 Merrill features a much larger APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor measuring 24 x 16 mm for a total sensor area of 384 mm². This sensor captures 15-megapixel images in a unique, layered manner to record full color at every pixel location - a technology praised for exceptional color fidelity and sharpness.
What does this mean for you?
- The DP3 Merrill’s sensor provides noticeably richer color depth and finer detail resolution, especially valuable in portrait and landscape photography.
- The TL210’s smaller sensor implies more noise at higher ISO settings (max native ISO 3200), limiting performance in low light and reducing dynamic range.
- The Sigma’s APS-C size and Foveon technology deliver superior color transitions and subdued noise up to ISO 6400, though it’s also known for slower processing times.
Display and Viewfinder Usability
Screen technology impacts how you compose, review, and interact with your images. Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, relying exclusively on rear LCDs, but their screens differ in size and resolution.
The Samsung TL210 sports a fixed 3.5-inch screen with a modest 230k-dot resolution. While ample for basic framing and reviewing images, it offers limited sharpness and brightness under strong sunlight.
On the other hand, the Sigma DP3 Merrill’s 3-inch screen has a much higher resolution of 920k dots, providing crisp detail and clearer image previews, essential when working with the DP3’s high-resolution RAW files.
If you often shoot outdoors or want precise manual focus, the Sigma’s superior display makes it easier to check focus sharpness and exposure. However, for casual snapshots, the Samsung’s larger screen might feel more comfortable for framing and playback despite lower resolution.
Image Quality in Action: Sample Comparisons
Looking at sample images side by side reveals practical differences beyond specs.
-
Portraits: The Sigma’s Foveon sensor produces stunning skin tones and natural hues with smooth gradation. Its 75mm fixed lens with a bright f/2.8 aperture creates beautiful subject separation and bokeh. The TL210, limited by a smaller sensor and slower lens, struggles to achieve shallow depth of field and natural skin reproduction.
-
Landscapes: The DP3 Merrill shines in dynamic range and detail, capturing subtle shadows and highlights without blown-out skies. The Samsung’s images appear flatter with less tonal graduation due to sensor and lens limitations.
-
Low Light: The Samsung shows obvious noise and reduced detail above ISO 800, whereas the Sigma maintains finer detail and less grain up to ISO 1600 or higher.
-
Video: Neither camera focuses on video prowess. The Samsung offers 720p recording, while the Sigma caps at VGA resolution - not suitable for serious videography.
What About Focus and Autofocus Systems?
Autofocus is critical depending on your photography style. Here, the differences are stark:
Feature | Samsung TL210 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast-detection | Manual focus only |
Number of AF Points | Center-weighted autofocus | No autofocus |
Face/Eye Detection | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Focus Modes | Single AF, Center AF | Manual focus ring |
Live View AF | Yes | No |
The TL210’s contrast-detection autofocus is basic but effective for casual shooting and still subjects. It even offers center-weighted AF but lacks face or eye detection, making it less efficient for portraits or moving subjects.
The Sigma DP3 Merrill is a manual focus camera, requiring you to engage actively in focusing - an advantage if you seek control and precision, but a hurdle if you need speed, such as in wildlife or sports.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
How do these two hold up across major photographic disciplines? Here’s a breakdown:
Portrait Photography
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Excels with superior skin tone reproduction, a fast f/2.8 lens, and selective focus capability. The 75mm equivalent focal length is ideal for flattering portraits with natural perspective.
- Samsung TL210: While convenient, the TL210 offers limited depth-of-field control, making professional-quality portraits challenging. Its fuzzier color rendering and noisier images often require post-processing fixes.
Landscape Photography
- Sigma DP3 Merrill dominates with its large sensor delivering superior detail and dynamic range. The fixed 75mm lens limits ultra-wide compositions but encourages precise, composed shots.
- Samsung TL210’s 27-135mm zoom offers more framing flexibility but sacrifices image quality, particularly in high contrast scenes where dynamic range is constrained.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Neither camera is designed for fast action or long distances.
- The TL210’s 5x zoom covers some telephoto needs but with slow aperture and slow AF response; burst shooting is unavailable.
- The DP3’s lack of autofocus and slower shooting rate (4 fps max but manual focus only) hampers fast subject tracking.
Street Photography
- Samsung TL210: Its compact size and pocketability make it discreet for candid shots.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Bulkier, it demands conscious handling but rewards with exceptional image quality if you have time to compose.
Macro Photography
- TL210 offers a macro focus range down to 5 cm, suitable for basic close-ups.
- DP3 Merrill lacks dedicated macro focus but manual focus can assist in precise close compositions.
Night and Astro Photography
- The DP3’s large sensor and higher ISO capability help capture cleaner low-light images.
- The Samsung’s smaller sensor struggles with noise, limiting night shooting.
Video Capabilities
- Both cameras fall short: TL210 offers 720p at 30fps, Sigma maxes at VGA.
- Neither has microphone input or advanced video features.
Travel Photography
- Samsung TL210 is light and pocket-friendly, suitable for casual travel.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill is heavier but produces pro-quality stills.
Professional Work
- Sigma DP3 Merrill supports RAW capture, manual exposure, custom white balance, and external flashes - features embraced in professional workflows.
- Samsung TL210 offers JPEG only, basic exposure modes, limiting its professional application.
Building Quality and Environmental Durability
Neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged build features such as waterproofing or dust resistance.
- Samsung TL210’s plastic body feels light but less robust.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill’s weight and build convey sturdiness despite lack of weather sealing.
Handling and User Interface Experience
Both cameras have fixed LCDs with no touchscreen or articulating screens. The Sigma’s higher-resolution LCD makes menu navigation and image reviewing easier for detail-oriented users.
Samsung’s user interface is simpler, befitting casual users, but lacks advanced exposure compensation or bracketing.
Lens and Focal Length Insights
Camera | Lens Mount | Focal Range (35mm equivalent) | Max Aperture |
---|---|---|---|
Samsung TL210 | Fixed Lens | 27-135 mm (5x optical zoom) | f/3.5 - f/5.9 |
Sigma DP3 Merrill | Fixed Lens | 75 mm (prime lens) | f/2.8 |
- Samsung’s zoom covers wide-angle to telephoto versatility for everyday shooting.
- Sigma’s fixed 75mm prime lens suits portrait and detail work but limits framing flexibility; however, prime glass generally delivers sharper, faster optics.
Power, Storage, and Connectivity
Feature | Samsung TL210 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | SLB-07B (proprietary) | Proprietary, model unspecified |
Battery Life | Not specified | Not specified |
Storage Media | MicroSD / MicroSDHC, Internal | Single slot, unspecified format |
Connectivity | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0 only |
Wireless Features | None | None |
GPS | None | None |
Both cameras lack Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, limiting convenience in modern connectivity. Practical backup plans for data transfer and power are essential.
Price-to-Performance Ratio and Value Assessment
An important consideration is price relative to what you get.
Camera | Approximate Price (USD) | Notes |
---|---|---|
Samsung TL210 | $230 | Affordable entry-level ultracompact |
Sigma DP3 Merrill | $1,350 | Premium large sensor compact for pros |
The Samsung TL210 offers a low-cost point-and-shoot for casual users who prioritize convenience over image quality. The Sigma DP3 Merrill demands a significant investment but rewards with outstanding image fidelity and manual control - perfect for serious enthusiasts or professionals who can work within its niche.
How They Score Overall and by Genre
From our evaluation:
- The Sigma DP3 Merrill scores highly for image quality, portrait, and landscape photography.
- Samsung TL210 excels in portability and casual snapshot ease.
- Neither excels in video, wildlife, or sports photography niches.
Bringing It All Together: Which Camera is Right for You?
Choose the Samsung TL210 if you:
- Want a compact, lightweight camera for travel, street, or casual photography.
- Prefer simplicity with automatic shooting modes and built-in stabilization.
- Are on a budget or looking for a secondary camera.
- Shoot primarily in well-lit conditions and do not require RAW files or advanced controls.
Choose the Sigma DP3 Merrill if you:
- Demand top-tier image quality with superior color fidelity and detail.
- Prefer manual focus and full control over aperture and shutter priority.
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, or commercial photography where image quality justifies slower operation.
- Require RAW support and external flash compatibility for professional workflows.
Final Thoughts: Hands-On Experience Matters
Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I can affirm that no spec sheet tells the entire story. The Samsung TL210 is a delightful travel companion for snapshots and candid moments but is limited in creative and technical flexibility. The Sigma DP3 Merrill caters to photographers who prioritize technical image excellence and control over rapid shooting or advanced autofocus.
Either way, getting hands-on experience is invaluable. If possible, check these cameras out in person, try their handling, and review sample images that match your shooting style.
Start Your Next Camera Adventure
Whatever your choice, both cameras represent distinct philosophies in compact photography - from approachable ultracompacts to specialist large sensor designs. Explore your creative priorities, and don’t hesitate to test these models with your style.
Feel free to check out compatible accessories, extra batteries, or even software workflows to maximize your experience.
Happy shooting!
If you found this guide helpful, consider sharing your experience with these cameras or ask us about other gear comparisons tailored to your specific needs.
Samsung TL210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Samsung TL210 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung TL210 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Also Known as | PL150 | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-135mm (5.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 177g (0.39 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-07B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $230 | $1,353 |