Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung TL225 and Sony W690, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TL225 (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TL225 was manufactured 3 years before the W690 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TL225 matches up against the W690 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL225 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung TL225 Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Sony W690
| TL225 | W690 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1152k | 230k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Samsung TL225
| W690 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Samsung TL225 and Sony W690
| TL225 | W690 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL225 provides external measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony W690 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Samsung TL225 and Sony W690 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TL225 vs the W690.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL225 and W690 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL225 and W690.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony W690 to produce greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged TL225 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung TL225 vs Sony W690 Specifications
| Samsung TL225 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL225 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
| Also called | ST550 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-08-13 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-124mm (4.6x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,152 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 187g (0.41 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-07A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $488 | $297 |