Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. The resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TL240 was revealed 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TL240 grades vs the WB350F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL240 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are provided at Samsung TL240 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung WB350F
TL240 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Samsung TL240
WB350F | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Samsung WB350F
TL240 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL240 enjoys physical dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TL240 against the WB350F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL240 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL240 and WB350F.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB350F to provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older TL240 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Samsung TL240 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung TL240 | Samsung WB350F |
Also referred to as | ST5000 | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 4800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $171 | $260 |