Clicky

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Samsung TL240 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as ST5000
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. The resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TL240 was revealed 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TL240 grades vs the WB350F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung WB350F

 TL240 WB350F 
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Samsung TL240

 WB350F TL240 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2010Fresher by 48 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Samsung WB350F

 TL240 WB350F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL240 enjoys physical dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TL240 against the WB350F.

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL240 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL240 and WB350F.

Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB350F to provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older TL240 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung TL240 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
28
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
40
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung TL240
Street photography with Samsung WB350F
60
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch to focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than others (160 grams)
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (276 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
Samsung WB350F Sports photography features
43
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Samsung TL240 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
60
has touch to focus
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than others (160g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than competition in class (276g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Samsung TL240 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography features
37
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
50
you can focus manually
fairly wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL240 Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
27
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than others (160g)
34
fairly wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (276g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung TL240 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung TL240 and Samsung WB350F
 Samsung TL240Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Samsung
Model type Samsung TL240 Samsung WB350F
Also referred to as ST5000 -
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-01-06 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4334 x 3256 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 4800 3200
Highest boosted ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 31-217mm (7.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 gr (0.35 lb) 276 gr (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-11A SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $171 $260