Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Portability
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Sony TX66
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Introduced February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Samsung TL240 versus Sony TX66, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the TL240 (14MP) and TX66 (18MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TL240 was brought out 3 years before the TX66 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the TL240 matches up versus the TX66 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL240 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung TL240 Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sony TX66
| TL240 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3.3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Samsung TL240
| TX66 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sony TX66
| TL240 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL240 provides physical dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL240 versus Sony TX66 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TL240 vs the TX66.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL240 and TX66 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TL240 and TX66.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Sony TX66 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older TL240 will be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung TL240 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony TX66 as a Portrait photography camera
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
has manual focus
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung TL240 as a Street photography camera
Sony TX66 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus by touch
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than others in class (160 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung TL240 as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX66 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery (250 CIPA)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung TL240 Travel photography highlights
Sony TX66 Travel photography highlights
provides focus by touch
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (160 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
better than average battery (250 per charge)
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (18MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography highlights
Sony TX66 Landscape photography highlights
screen larger than average (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
has manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3.3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18MP)
better than average battery (250 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung TL240 as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX66 as a Vlogging camera
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (160g)
fairly wide (26mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
missing microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung TL240 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
| Samsung TL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
| Also called | ST5000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 4800 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3.3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 109g (0.24 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $171 | $350 |