Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as WB1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TL320 was brought out 4 years prior to the WB800F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TL320 grades vs the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL320 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung TL320 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Samsung WB800F
| TL320 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung TL320
| WB800F | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Samsung WB800F
| TL320 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL320 comes with outer measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TL320 compared to the WB800F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL320 and WB800F is 98 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TL320 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to offer you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older TL320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | WB1000 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $300 |