Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB1000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung TL320 and Sony A200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the TL320 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty close but the TL320 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TL320 was manufactured 8 months after the A200 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TL320 grades vs the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL320 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung TL320 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony A200
| TL320 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2009 |  | July 2008 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Samsung TL320
| A200 | TL320 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony A200
| TL320 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL320 has got outer measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL320 and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TL320 vs the A200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL320 and A200 is 98 and 66 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TL320 and A200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TL320 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung TL320 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TL320 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung TL320 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung TL320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Also Known as | WB1000 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $100 |
