Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Announced July 2018

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the TL320 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") have totally different sensor sizes.

The TL320 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the RX100 VA which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TL320 scores versus the RX100 VA in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The full galleries are available at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony RX100 VA
TL320 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Samsung TL320
RX100 VA | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2018 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 114 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony RX100 VA
TL320 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL320 provides outside measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony RX100 VA has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TL320 versus the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TL320 and RX100 VA is 98 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TL320 and RX100 VA.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TL320 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX100 VA will render greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TL320 will be behind in sensor tech.
-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg)

Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Alternative name | WB1000 | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-02-23 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $380 | $998 |