Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the TL320 (12MP) and the W230 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TL320 was launched about the same time to the W230 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W230 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TL320 grades against the W230 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony W230
| TL320 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Samsung TL320
| W230 | TL320 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony W230
| TL320 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL320 has got exterior dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony W230 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the TL320 versus the W230.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TL320 and W230 is 98 and 95 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL320 and W230.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung TL320 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Otherwise known as | WB1000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $180 |