Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38


83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced January 2019

Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung TL350 and Sony A6400, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the TL350 (10MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the TL350 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

The TL350 was unveiled 10 years before the A6400 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TL350 scores vs the A6400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL350 & Sony Alpha a6400. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung TL350 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Sony A6400
TL350 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Samsung TL350
A6400 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 108 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL350 and Sony A6400
TL350 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung TL350 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A6400 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung TL350 and Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TL350 vs the A6400.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TL350 and A6400 is 94 and 83 respectively.

Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The image below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TL350 and A6400.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TL350 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6400 will provide extra detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged TL350 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL350 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Samsung TL350 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung TL350 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Also referred to as | WB2000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-20 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) | 403 grams (0.89 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $400 | $898 |