Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the TL500 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the TL500 (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TL500 was launched 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TL500 grades versus the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Samsung TL500 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Samsung WB35F
TL500 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung TL500
WB35F | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB35F
TL500 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung TL500 has got external dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TL500 compared to the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL500 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL500 and WB35F.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TL500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TL500 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB35F |
Also referred to as | EX1 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-07-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 386 gr (0.85 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 40 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 129 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-07A | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $527 | $130 |