Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Samsung TL500 and Sigma Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the TL500 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the TL500 (1/1.7") and Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TL500 was unveiled 6 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TL500 scores against the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL500 and Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung TL500 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Sigma Quattro
| TL500 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung TL500
| Quattro | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 68 months |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 614k | Crisper screen (+1006k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Sigma Quattro
| TL500 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL500 has got physical measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL500 and Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TL500 vs the Quattro.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL500 and Quattro is 88 and 63 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TL500 and Quattro.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TL500 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will resolve more detail having an extra 19MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged TL500 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung TL500 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Samsung TL500 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung TL500 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Alternative name | EX1 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-07-09 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 29MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 614k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 40 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 129 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-07A | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $527 | $738 |