Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Samsung WB150F versus Sony A390, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB150F (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is very comparable but the WB150F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB150F was manufactured 18 months later than the A390 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the WB150F grades versus the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB150F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB150F Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony A390
| WB150F | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | July 2010 | Fresher by 18 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB150F
| A390 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony A390
| WB150F | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB150F has got external measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony A390 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Samsung WB150F versus Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the WB150F and the A390.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WB150F and A390 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB150F and A390.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but different sensor sizing. The WB150F provides the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The more recent WB150F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung WB150F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB150F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188g (0.41 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $230 | $500 |