Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d758/4d7589dcc942153faab2d3b0b30c7066d1be62b2" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front"
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Replacement is Sony RX1R II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung WB150F and Sony RX1R, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WB150F (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WB150F was manufactured 17 months before the RX1R making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WB150F scores against the RX1R in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB150F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB150F Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony RX1R
WB150F | RX1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Samsung WB150F
RX1R | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 17 months |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony RX1R
WB150F | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB150F enjoys external measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB150F and Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the WB150F against the RX1R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ebc2/0ebc20c1eef474ed99b8ec598a1722317c227bbb" alt="Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R size comparison Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB150F and RX1R is 93 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0021/d00215704cd3b4852decbd13841d6baec7bb6a68" alt="Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The image here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB150F and RX1R.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB150F due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX1R will result in more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged WB150F will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56df6/56df667df8e085e8089936e083c1c329a7d33d8c" alt="Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a88c/7a88c2b1838e76fe1e2ed67d778ab33c74a05a1f" alt="Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2013-06-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) | 482 gr (1.06 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $230 | $2,798 |