Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Expand to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
- Later Model is Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the WB210 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WB210 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WB210 was manufactured 7 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WB210 grades against the SD10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB210 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sigma SD10
| WB210 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | March 2004 | More recent by 90 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Samsung WB210
| SD10 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 130k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+129k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD10
| WB210 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB210 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the WB210 against the SD10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WB210 and SD10 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WB210 and SD10.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB210 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB210 will give you greater detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger WB210 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 174 gr (0.38 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSC/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $198 |