Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
![Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB2200F/Samsung-WB2200F-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III/Sony-RX10-III-front.jpg)
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX10 II
- Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung WB2200F versus Sony RX10 III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB2200F (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very well matched but the WB2200F (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The WB2200F was unveiled 3 years prior to the RX10 III which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WB2200F matches up versus the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB2200F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB2200F Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sony RX10 III
WB2200F | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung WB2200F
RX10 III | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2016 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 27 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sony RX10 III
WB2200F | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB2200F features outer dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") having a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
See the Samsung WB2200F versus Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the WB2200F and the RX10 III.
![Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III size comparison Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB2200F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB2200F and RX10 III is 59 and 53 respectively.
![Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB2200F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The image underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB2200F and RX10 III.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB2200F using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 III will resolve extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WB2200F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-WB2200F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB2200F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 708 gr (1.56 lbs) | 1051 gr (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-1410 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SCXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $1,398 |