Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3d0/6f3d00d7c30cb034b59ae160397ff233ae021e98" alt="Samsung WB250F front Samsung WB250F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d758/4d7589dcc942153faab2d3b0b30c7066d1be62b2" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front"
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Overview
Below, we are matching up the Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WB250F was announced 5 months prior to the RX1R so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WB250F matches up versus the RX1R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB250F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony RX1R
WB250F | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Samsung WB250F
RX1R | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony RX1R
WB250F | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2013 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB250F has outside dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the WB250F and the RX1R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf9ac/bf9ac6dca6f1294dda6b64d0e9a47bcdb8a3fbcb" alt="Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R size comparison Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and RX1R is 93 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/024c3/024c3af093200e4c9913885c14a8201455c21749" alt="Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB250F and RX1R.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB250F using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX1R will resolve more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2882/f288210279229fbd610301f3e41a539d651902fb" alt="Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df1d8/df1d85bad1c9acdf5096754462fec1a64a7e6123" alt="Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 482 grams (1.06 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $2,798 |