Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40


78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony RX1R

Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Samsung WB250F versus Sony RX1R II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) provide different sensor size.

The WB250F was introduced 3 years before the RX1R II and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB250F matches up against the RX1R II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB250F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB250F Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony RX1R II
WB250F | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung WB250F
RX1R II | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 33 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony RX1R II
WB250F | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB250F enjoys outer measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB250F versus Sony RX1R II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WB250F against the RX1R II.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WB250F and RX1R II is 93 and 78 respectively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB250F and RX1R II.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB250F using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony RX1R II will give you more detail using its extra 28 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older WB250F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 14cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 507 grams (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $250 | $3,300 |