Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB250F (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB250F was released 3 years after the T900 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the WB250F matches up against the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB250F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony T900
| WB250F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung WB250F
| T900 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony T900
| WB250F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB250F provides outer measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the WB250F compared to the T900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB250F and T900.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB250F to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger WB250F provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB250F vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $300 |
